State v. Leitch
This text of 436 So. 2d 1322 (State v. Leitch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
ORDER TO DISMISS
On June 27,1983 the Trial Judge granted the State until July 8 to file this writ application. On July 13 the State orally moved and was granted an extension.
Although the trial court may grant an extension under Rule 4-3, it may not do so after the original time for applying has expired. See State v. Sutton, 374 So.2d 1218 (La.1979); State v. Mandino, 352 So.2d 233 (La.1977).
Further, we find relator’s application is without merit but we dismiss for the foregoing reason.
THEREFORE, this writ application is dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
436 So. 2d 1322, 1983 La. App. LEXIS 9066, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-leitch-lactapp-1983.