State v. Legore

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. Legore

507 P.3d 354, 318 Or. App. 546

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedMarch 23, 2022

DocketA172966

StatusPublished

This text of 507 P.3d 354 (State v. Legore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Legore, 507 P.3d 354, 318 Or. App. 546 (Or. Ct. App. 2022).

Pincite

Opinion

Submitted February 28; award of restitution reversed, remanded for resentencing, otherwise affirmed March 23, 2022

STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. INGRID ISABELLE LEGORE, Defendant-Appellant. Multnomah County Circuit Court 19CR39866; A172966 507 P3d 354

Shelley D. Russell, Judge. Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate Section, and Sarah De La Cruz, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant. Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Rolf C. Moan, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent. Before Ortega, Presiding Judge, and Powers, Judge, and Hellman, Judge. PER CURIAM Award of restitution reversed; remanded for resentenc- ing; otherwise affirmed. Cite as 318 Or App 546 (2022) 547

PER CURIAM Defendant, who was convicted of second-degree criminal mischief, ORS 164.354, appeals that judgment of conviction along with an award of $210 in restitution to the victim of the offense. We reject three of defendant’s four assignments of error without discussion, addressing only her argument that the record did not establish that the vic- tim sustained an economic loss of $210. The state concedes the error. Any discussion of the details of this matter would not benefit the bench, the bar, or the public. We agree with and accept the state’s concession. Award of restitution reversed; remanded for resen- tencing; otherwise affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Submitted February 28; award of restitution reversed, remanded for resentencing, otherwise affirmed March 23, 2022

STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. INGRID ISABELLE LEGORE, Defendant-Appellant. Multnomah County Circuit Court 19CR39866; A172966 507 P3d 354

Shelley D. Russell, Judge. Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate Section, and Sarah De La Cruz, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant. Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Rolf C. Moan, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent. Before Ortega, Presiding Judge, and Powers, Judge, and Hellman, Judge. PER CURIAM Award of restitution reversed; remanded for resentenc- ing; otherwise affirmed. Cite as 318 Or App 546 (2022) 547

PER CURIAM Defendant, who was convicted of second-degree criminal mischief, ORS 164.354, appeals that judgment of conviction along with an award of $210 in restitution to the victim of the offense. We reject three of defendant’s four assignments of error without discussion, addressing only her argument that the record did not establish that the vic- tim sustained an economic loss of $210. The state concedes the error. Any discussion of the details of this matter would not benefit the bench, the bar, or the public. We agree with and accept the state’s concession. Award of restitution reversed; remanded for resen- tencing; otherwise affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

507 P.3d 354, 318 Or. App. 546, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-legore-orctapp-2022.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack