State v. Lee

846 P.2d 424, 118 Or. App. 93, 1993 Ore. App. LEXIS 127
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided February 3, 1993·No. MH 1158; CA A74399·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Appellant appeals an order committing him to the Mental Health Division under ORS 426.005. His sole contention is that he was not given proper notice of the proceeding under ORS 426.070.1 The court denied his motion to dismiss the commitment proceedings on that ground. We affirm.

Appellant was taken into custody by a police officer who thought that he was in need of immediate treatment for mental illness. He was later taken to the commitment hearing.

He contends that the notice provisions of ORS 426.070(2) should apply to a peace officer hold under ORS 426.215. There is no requirement in the latter statute that a notice under oath be provided when an officer takes a person into custody on a mental health hold. We do not interpret the notice provisions of ORS 426.070 to apply to a peace officer hold. Appellant makes no constitutional challenge to the procedure of ORS 426.215.

Affirmed.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Lee, 846 P.2d 424, 118 Or. App. 93, 1993 Ore. App. LEXIS 127 (Or. Ct. App. 1993).

846 P.2d 424 (State v. Lee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 426.005
Oregon § 426.005
§ 426.070
Oregon § 426.070
§ 426.215
Oregon § 426.215