State v. Lee

59 A. 1118, 74 N.J.L. 852, 45 Vroom 852, 1905 N.J. LEXIS 131
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided January 20, 1905·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment brought up by this writ of error must be affirmed, on the grounds stated in the opinion of Mr. Justice Dixon in the Supreme Court, reported in 41 Vroom 368.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Garrison, Fort, Garretson, Pitney, Reed, Bogert, Vredenburgii, Yoori-iees, Yroom, Gray’, J.J. 11.

For reversal — Done.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Lee, 59 A. 1118, 74 N.J.L. 852, 45 Vroom 852, 1905 N.J. LEXIS 131 (N.J. 1905).

59 A. 1118 (State v. Lee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. SMITH
246 A.2d 35 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1968)