State v. Lee

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Lee

278 S.W.3d 691, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 61, 2009 WL 972996

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Lee. Read the opinion of the Court — 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 19 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 13, 2009·No. WD 68886·Published

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM:

James E. Lee appeals the judgment of his conviction of the class A felony of trafficking drugs in the second degree in violation of section 195.223.3.

Having carefully considered the contentions on appeal, we find no grounds for reversing the decision. Publication of a formal opinion would not serve jurisprudential purposes or add to understanding of existing law. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

PER CURIAM:

James E. Lee appeals the judgment of his conviction of the class A felony of trafficking drugs in the second degree in violation of section 195.223.3.

Having carefully considered the contentions on appeal, we find no grounds for reversing the decision. Publication of a formal opinion would not serve jurisprudential purposes or add to understanding of existing law. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Lee, 278 S.W.3d 691, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 61, 2009 WL 972996 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

278 S.W.3d 691 (State v. Lee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related