State v. Lee

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Lee

36 S.W.3d 405, 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 61, 2001 WL 32738

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 16, 2001

DocketNo. ED 77124

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 36 S.W.3d 405 (State v. Lee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Lee, 36 S.W.3d 405, 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 61, 2001 WL 32738 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

[406]*406 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Chico D. Lee (“defendant”) appeals the judgment on his conviction, after a jury trial, of distributing a controlled substance under section 195.211. The court sentenced defendant to twenty years of imprisonment as a prior and persistent offender. Defendant claims the trial court plainly erred in allowing inadmissible hearsay testimony of other crimes.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI