State v. Lee

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Lee

813 S.W.2d 26, 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 1113, 1991 WL 87550

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Lee. Read the opinion of the Court — 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 954 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 28, 1991·No. Nos. 57836, 59270·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his conviction by a jury of first degree murder, § 565.020.1, RSMo 1986, and armed criminal action, § 571.015.1, RSMo 1986, and the dismissal of his Rule 29.15 motion for failure to file [27]*27within the mandatory time limits. We affirm.

The judgments are based upon findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and no error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his conviction by a jury of first degree murder, § 565.020.1, RSMo 1986, and armed criminal action, § 571.015.1, RSMo 1986, and the dismissal of his Rule 29.15 motion for failure to file [27]*27within the mandatory time limits. We affirm.

The judgments are based upon findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and no error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).

State v. Lee, 813 S.W.2d 26, 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 1113, 1991 WL 87550 (Mo. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

813 S.W.2d 26 (State v. Lee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.