State v. Lee
72 So. 195, 111 Miss. 773
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
It is clear the indictment charges each of the defendants-with having cut Tates, “with the felonious intent then and there him, the said Jim Tates, to unlawfully, willfully, feloniously, and of his malice aforethought kill and murder,” and, although the language used is ungrammatical, the indictment nevertheless is valid.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Lee, 72 So. 195, 111 Miss. 773 (Mich. 1916).
72 So. 195 (State v. Lee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Henderson v. State
445 So. 2d 1364 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1984)