State v. Lee
This text of 946 So. 2d 174 (State v. Lee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Writ denied. The record, as supplemented with the transcript of the October 22, 2004- evidentiary hearing, which followed remand of the case for that purpose by this Court in State v. Lee, 03-0032 (La.6/27/03), 852 So.2d 987, is sufficient to show that the defense did not raise a bona fide concern regarding the defendant’s competency to proceed, and that the trial judge never found that reasonable grounds existed for doubting defendant’s competency sufficient to require that prosecution be halted until the issue was resolved in accord with La.C.Cr.P. arts. 641 et seq. Therefore, the court of appeal need not have conducted a nunc pro tunc determination of the defendant’s competency.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
946 So. 2d 174, 2007 La. LEXIS 87, 2007 WL 101985, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-lee-la-2007.