Home/Supreme Court of Louisiana/State v. Lee

State v. Lee

641 So. 2d 206, 1994 La. LEXIS 1556
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Lee. Read the opinion of the Court — 637 So. 2d 102 →
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided June 17, 1994·No. No. 94-K-0814·Published

Opinion

In re Lee, Bobby James; — Defendants); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. CR93-0662; Parish of Evangeline, Thirteenth Judicial District Court, Div. “A”, No. 44,247-F.

Granted in part; denied in part. The defendant’s conviction is affirmed. His sentence is amended to delete the requirement of restitution. La.R.S. 14:67 does not authorize the court to order restitution as part of an executory sentence of imprisonment. Compare La.R.S. 14:67.3 Cf., La.C.Cr.P. art. 895.1 (restitution as a condition of probation).

DENNIS, J., not on panel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Lee, 641 So. 2d 206, 1994 La. LEXIS 1556 (La. 1994).

641 So. 2d 206 (State v. Lee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.