State v. Ledet
This text of 533 So. 2d 345 (State v. Ledet) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
In re Ledet, Timothy; Crouch, Wayne R.; — Defendants); applying for supervisory/remedial writs; Parish of Rapides, 9th Judicial District Court, Div. “C”, No. 148646; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. KW88-0739.
Granted. The judgment of the trial court is reversed. The evidence is insufficient to support a finding that relator willfully disobeyed a lawful order of the court. La.C.Cr.P. art. 23; In re Harris, 493 So.2d 1199 (La.1986). Relator could have reasonably believed that the court’s setting a hearing on the request for a protective order stayed the effect of the deposition notice and subpoena duces tecum pending the hearing; otherwise, the hearing would have been rendered moot.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
533 So. 2d 345, 1988 La. LEXIS 2418, 1988 WL 126348, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-ledet-la-1988.