State v. Ledener

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Ledener

216 So. 2d 548, 253 La. 69, 1968 La. LEXIS 2557

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedDecember 31, 1968

DocketNo. 49592

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 216 So. 2d 548 (State v. Ledener) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Ledener, 216 So. 2d 548, 253 La. 69, 1968 La. LEXIS 2557 (La. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

In re: State of Louisiana applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus.

The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

It is ordered that a writ of certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable Richard H. Gauthier, Judge of the Twenty-Fifth Judicial District, Court for the Parish of St. Bernard to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 28th day of February, 1969, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through his attorney shall show cause, in this court, on the date aforesaid, at 11 o’clock A.M., why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re: State of Louisiana applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus.

The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

It is ordered that a writ of certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable Richard H. Gauthier, Judge of the Twenty-Fifth Judicial District, Court for the Parish of St. Bernard to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 28th day of February, 1969, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through his attorney shall show cause, in this court, on the date aforesaid, at 11 o’clock A.M., why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

216 So. 2d 548, 253 La. 69, 1968 La. LEXIS 2557, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-ledener-la-1968.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack