State v. Ledbetter

793 S.E.2d 216, 369 N.C. 64, 2016 N.C. LEXIS 817
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided September 22, 2016·No. No. 402P15·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

Defendant’s petition for discretionary review is allowed for the limited purpose of remanding to the Court of Appeals to reconsider its holding in light of State v. Thomsen, N.C. , 789 S.E.2d 639 (2016), and State v. Stubbs, 368 N.C. 40, 770 S.E.2d 74 (2015). See Thomsen, _ N.C. at _, 789 S.E.2d at 642. (recognizing N.C.G.S. § 7A-32(c) “creates a default rule that the Court of Appeals has jurisdiction to review a lower court judgment by writ of certiorari”); Stubbs, 368 N.C. at 44, 770 S.E.2d at 76 (recognizing that Rule 21 of the North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure cannot take away jurisdiction given to the Court of Appeals by N.C.G.S. § 7A-32(c)).

By Order of the Court in Conference, this 22nd day of September, 2016.

s/Ervin. J.

For the Court

WITNESS my hand and the seal of the Supreme Court of North Carolina, this the 23rd day of September, 2016.

J. BRYAN BOYD Clerk of the Supreme Court

s/M.C. Hackney Assistant Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Ledbetter, 793 S.E.2d 216, 369 N.C. 64, 2016 N.C. LEXIS 817 (N.C. 2016).

793 S.E.2d 216 (State v. Ledbetter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Ledbetter
814 S.E.2d 39 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2018)