State v. LeClair

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

State v. LeClair

534 A.2d 354, 1987 Me. LEXIS 846

DecidedDecember 8, 1987

StatusPublished

This text of 534 A.2d 354 (State v. LeClair) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. LeClair, 534 A.2d 354, 1987 Me. LEXIS 846 (Me. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

[355]*355MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.

Paul LeClair appeals from the judgment of the Superior Court, Somerset County, entered after a jury waived trial finding him guilty of assault, 17-A M.R.S.A. § 207(2) (Supp.1986), and gross sexual misconduct, 17-A M.R.S.A. § 253(1)(B) (Supp. 1986), challenging the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict and the admission of certain photographic evidence and expert medical testimony.

Our review of the record discloses that based on the evidence viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution any trier of fact rationally could find beyond a reasonable doubt every element of the offenses charged, State v. Barry, 495 A.2d 825, 826 (Me.1985), and that the court properly admitted the photographs and expert medical testimony. See M.R.Evid. 401, 403 and 702; State v. Conlogue, 474 A.2d 167, 170-71 (Me.1984); State v. Barnett, 480 A.2d 791, 794 (Me.1984).

The entry is:

Judgment affirmed.

All concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI