State v. Lebouef

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Lebouef

623 So. 2d 1319, 1993 La. LEXIS 2563, 1993 WL 364342

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedSeptember 17, 1993

DocketNo. 92-K-3153

StatusPublished

This text of 623 So. 2d 1319 (State v. Lebouef) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Lebouef, 623 So. 2d 1319, 1993 La. LEXIS 2563, 1993 WL 364342 (La. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

[1320]*1320In re Lebouef, Ricky Anthony; — Defendants); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. KA91 1753; Parish of Terrebonne, 32nd Judicial District Court, Div. “C”, No. 200,749.

Granted in part; denied in part. Defendant’s sentence is vacated and the case is remanded to the district court for resentenc-ing under La.C.Cr.P. art. 894.1, as amended by La. Acts 1991, No. 22, section 1, eff. January 1, 1992. The record of sentencing does not demonstrate adequate compliance with Art. 894.1 nor does it reflect that the trial court provided a factual basis for choice of punishment. State v. Conrad, 619 So.2d 1060 (La.1993); State v. Sabathe, 617 So.2d 1176 (La.1992); State v. Blue, 591 So.2d 1173 (La.App.1992). In all other respects, the application is denied.

ORTIQUE, J., not on panel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[1320]*1320In re Lebouef, Ricky Anthony; — Defendants); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. KA91 1753; Parish of Terrebonne, 32nd Judicial District Court, Div. “C”, No. 200,749.

Granted in part; denied in part. Defendant’s sentence is vacated and the case is remanded to the district court for resentenc-ing under La.C.Cr.P. art. 894.1, as amended by La. Acts 1991, No. 22, section 1, eff. January 1, 1992. The record of sentencing does not demonstrate adequate compliance with Art. 894.1 nor does it reflect that the trial court provided a factual basis for choice of punishment. State v. Conrad, 619 So.2d 1060 (La.1993); State v. Sabathe, 617 So.2d 1176 (La.1992); State v. Blue, 591 So.2d 1173 (La.App.1992). In all other respects, the application is denied.

ORTIQUE, J., not on panel.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

623 So. 2d 1319, 1993 La. LEXIS 2563, 1993 WL 364342, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-lebouef-la-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack