State v. Lebouef

623 So. 2d 1319, 1993 La. LEXIS 2563, 1993 WL 364342
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided September 17, 1993·No. No. 92-K-3153·Published

Opinion

[1320] In re Lebouef, Ricky Anthony; — Defendants); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. KA91 1753; Parish of Terrebonne, 32nd Judicial District Court, Div. “C”, No. 200,749.

Granted in part; denied in part. Defendant’s sentence is vacated and the case is remanded to the district court for resentenc-ing under La.C.Cr.P. art. 894.1, as amended by La. Acts 1991, No. 22, section 1, eff. January 1, 1992. The record of sentencing does not demonstrate adequate compliance with Art. 894.1 nor does it reflect that the trial court provided a factual basis for choice of punishment. State v. Conrad, 619 So.2d 1060 (La.1993); State v. Sabathe, 617 So.2d 1176 (La.1992); State v. Blue, 591 So.2d 1173 (La.App.1992). In all other respects, the application is denied.

ORTIQUE, J., not on panel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Lebouef, 623 So. 2d 1319, 1993 La. LEXIS 2563, 1993 WL 364342 (La. 1993).

623 So. 2d 1319 (State v. Lebouef) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Sabathe
617 So. 2d 1176 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1993)
State v. Blue
591 So. 2d 1173 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1991)
State v. Conrad
619 So. 2d 1060 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1993)