State v. Lebon

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Lebon

476 S.W.3d 305, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1004, 2015 WL 5829745

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 6, 2015

DocketED 101559

StatusPublished

This text of 476 S.W.3d 305 (State v. Lebon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Lebon, 476 S.W.3d 305, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1004, 2015 WL 5829745 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Thomas P. Lebon (Appellant) appeals from the judgment entered by the trial court upon a jury verdict finding him [306]*306guilty of second-degree burglary, stealing, and possession of burglar’s tools. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court did not abuse its discretion in the admission of evidence nor err in denying Appellant’s motion to dismiss based on the Uniform Mandatory Disposition of Detainers Law. State v. Kelly, 367 S.W.3d 629, 630 (Mo.App.E.D. 2012); State v. McKay, 411 S.W.3d 295, 300 (Mo.App.E.D. 2013). An extended opinion , would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decisión tó the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Thomas P. Lebon (Appellant) appeals from the judgment entered by the trial court upon a jury verdict finding him [306]*306guilty of second-degree burglary, stealing, and possession of burglar’s tools. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court did not abuse its discretion in the admission of evidence nor err in denying Appellant’s motion to dismiss based on the Uniform Mandatory Disposition of Detainers Law. State v. Kelly, 367 S.W.3d 629, 630 (Mo.App.E.D. 2012); State v. McKay, 411 S.W.3d 295, 300 (Mo.App.E.D. 2013). An extended opinion , would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decisión tó the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

476 S.W.3d 305, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1004, 2015 WL 5829745, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-lebon-moctapp-2015.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack