State v. Leatherman
This text of 177 So. 255 (State v. Leatherman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant, Ed Leatherman, was charged with violating an ordinance adopted by the Police Jury of Rapides Parish on January 15, 1935. He was tried, convicted, and sentenced on the charge. On appeal he relies on bills of exception taken to the action of the trial judge in overruling his motions to quash, for a new trial, and in arrest of judgment. Defendant’s complaint as set forth in his pleadings is that the ordinance is unconstitutional and invalid.
The case presents the same issues as are presented in the case of State v. Roy Reed, 188 La. -, 177 So. 252, this day decided.
For the reasons assigned in the case of State v. Reed, the conviction and sentence herein appealed from are annulled, the motion to quash is sustained, and defendant is ordered discharged.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
177 So. 255, 188 La. 411, 1937 La. LEXIS 1271, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-leatherman-la-1937.