State v. Lealao

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Lealao. Read the opinion of the Court — 126 Haw. 460
Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided February 27, 2012·No. SCWC-30502·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-30502 27-FEB-2012 02:12 PM

NO. SCWC-30502

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I

STATE OF HAWAI'I, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

BLUE LEALAO, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(ICA NO. 30502; CR. NO. 10-1-0240)

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama,

Acoba, Duffy, and McKenna, JJ.)

The Application for Writ of Certiorari filed on January

14, 2012 by Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant, Blue Lealao is hereby

accepted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that no oral argument will be

held in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant

to Rule 34(c) of the Hawai'i Rules of Appellate Procedure, move

for retention of oral argument.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, February 27, 2012.

Lars Robert Isaacson, /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

for petitioner/

defendant-appellant, /s/ Paula A. Nakayama

on the application.

/s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.

Keith M. Kaneshiro

and Donn Fudo, /s/ James E. Duffy, Jr.

for respondent/

plaintiff-appellee, /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

on the response.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Lealao, (haw 2012).

State v. Lealao (State v. Lealao) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.