State v. Leach

767 P.2d 463, 94 Or. App. 778, 1989 Ore. App. LEXIS 35
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided January 18, 1989·No. CR7-0271-34; CA A48095·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant was arrested for driving under the influence of intoxicants, ORS 813.010, on April 25,1987. He agreed to submit to a breath test, which was administered after he had been observed for only 12 minutes. The test indicated a blood alcohol level of .10 percent. Defendant asked that a second test be given. He was told that he need not submit to a second test but that the results could be used against him in court if the test were administered at his request. He insisted, and a second test was administered four minutes after the first. The second test indicated a blood alcohol level of .09 percent. The trial court suppressed the results of the first test, because defendant had not been observed for the 15 minutes required by OAR 257-30-020(1)(b) before the test was administered. The state does not contest that ruling.

We agree with the trial court that the second test must be suppressed as well, because it was not administered “upon the request of a police officer” as required by ORS 813.100. The administration of a second breath test at a suspect’s request is contemplated by ORS 813.150,1 but the result is not admissible over a defendant’s objection under the version of ORS 813.010(1) (a) in effect at the time of the violation alleged here.2

Affirmed.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Leach, 767 P.2d 463, 94 Or. App. 778, 1989 Ore. App. LEXIS 35 (Or. Ct. App. 1989).

767 P.2d 463 (State v. Leach) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Balderson
910 P.2d 1138 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1996)