State v. . Leach

25 S.E. 858, 119 N.C. 828
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedSeptember 5, 1896
StatusPublished

This text of 25 S.E. 858 (State v. . Leach) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. . Leach, 25 S.E. 858, 119 N.C. 828 (N.C. 1896).

Opinion

H.H. Henderson testified: That he lives about seven miles north of Pittsboro. Was in Pittsboro 25 September, and frequently during the day in the barroom of A. P. Terry, and was drinking some, but was not drunk. Took four drinks during the day. Came to Pittsboro about 9 in the morning. Knows what happened and was able to attend to his business. Left the barroom about 8 or a little before. That he had about $40 or $45 in his pocket, in greenbacks, and a few dollars in silver. Pulled this money out of his pocket while in the barroom, and had it out several times during the day. Defendant was present when he had the money out and knew he had it, and saw it. That he came to town on horseback and left his horse hitched behind the store of O. S. Poe Son, about 75 or 80 yards from the barroom. When he left the barroom for his horse, it being about dark, the defendant and another party (Will Baldwin) followed him to his horse. He did not need their assistance, and did not ask them to go with him. He had a bundle of socks and a bundle of shoes in his arms. They followed him to his horse. Baldwin held the horse by the bridle. Defendant Leach pretended to assist him on his horse, and after he was on the horse the defendant, with his hands still on him, attempted to take the money from his pocket. The money was in a left-hand front pants pocket, and the defendant saw him put it *Page 519 there before he left the barroom. That he said to him: "Never mind my pocket, I will attend to my pocketbook myself. Take your hand out of my pocket. You are trying to take my money"; and defendant replied, "I will see you later." He then rode off in a walk, and did not see him any more. The road toward his home was west about one-fourth mile, and then turned at right angles north. He rode along in a (830) walk till he reached the corner of Hal London's, which was the corner of the right angle, and rode down the north road about one-fourth mile, and as he was in a few yards of the Taylor place he was struck from behind and knocked from his horse. Remembered no more until about daybreak next morning, when he was aroused by the mail rider and others, who came out from town for him, to wit: Mr. Clark, Mr. Hill, and Aaron Degraffenreid. His money was gone, and the shoes and socks and his knife were lying by him in the road.

T. B. Fowler testified: That he lived in Pittsboro and saw Henderson in town on the day he was struck — Friday, 25 September. Saw him late in the evening. He was drinking but not drunk. He was well acquainted with the road leading out to Henderson's home, and it runs west after leaving Poe's store, about one-fourth mile, and then turns north at right angles. That leaving Poe's store, where Henderson's horse was hitched, and going through the field to the point where Henderson was struck is about one-fourth mile nearer than going around the road. That the way to go through the field, and a direct line to the said point after leaving Poe's store, is to go up by the postoffice and down the alley at Exline's Hotel, out by the old schoolhouse in the field, or go down by Lineberry's house, at the corner of the block, and go up to the schoolhouse, meeting the alley from Exline's, and that the distance from Poe's store to the schoolhouse is the same either way. The schoolhouse is at the opposite corner of the block from Poe's store — a few yards beyond. The direct way from the schoolhouse to the point on the main road (the Snow Camp road) is through an old field, crossing a creek, and some old straw fields — some cultivated land. He went out this way the morning after the robbery, and just after he crossed the creek he (831) found tracks alongside an old hedge and followed these tracks, and they went directly to a large tree on the road, or a few yards above where Henderson was found next morning after the robbery. Tracks made by a number 10 shoe on left foot, which was run down on the heel. Right foot apparently straight. After describing the route through an old field the witness stated that he followed the tracks, and that they left an old dim path soon after crossing the creek, and that by going that way from Poe's store it was a quarter of a mile nearer than by going around the road, but leaving the place where Henderson was found, where there was a large quantity of blood on the ground, he found the *Page 520 same tracks going away, but crossing the fence between the points where they came into the road and where the blood was found. They came into the path of the tracks going out about 50 yards from the road, and in coming this way they passed through an open field, and were made by some one while running. All these tracks were evidently made the day or night before, and were nearly fresh. On the following day (Haywood having been arrested and placed in jail that evening), the day of his first search, he, in company with others, took the shoes found on the defendant when arrested and carried them to these tracks, and tried them in those which were the plainest, and they fit exactly, and the run-down shoe settled exactly in the track of that foot. That, besides the run-down part of it, the left shoe had a broken place in the sole, near the toe, and on the right side. That he noticed this in the track — peculiarity in the track — and when the shoe was placed in it he found that this peculiar rough place, which he had noticed in the track, fit exactly. On the right-hand track, at the heel, he observed a rise in (832) the middle of the track — a small mound — as if the dirt in the middle of the heel had been pressed down even with the remainder of the bottom of the heel. When he saw the right shoe of defendant at the trial he noticed that there was a smooth hole in the middle of the right heel as if it had been burned by a hot iron. When placed in the track this cavity in the heel fit the mound of the track. Witness was convinced that the shoe made the track. The shoe was half-soled, and the track showed it was made by a shoe which had been half-soled. "I went and got defendant's shoes. He did not object to giving them up. He was in jail."

F. C. Poe testified that he is a member of the firm of O. S. Poe Son. Saw Henderson on 25 September. He was frequently in his store, and was in there just as he was closing his store. He was not drunk, but had been drinking. Saw him have a roll of money, and he paid him some just as he was leaving his store. Knows the point where Henderson is said to have been found. Saw a large quantity of blood there on the ground. Went with witness Fowler, and saw track, as testified to by Fowler. This witness testified substantially as did Fowler.

Will Baldwin testified: That he was with defendant on the night of 25 September. Went with him to Henderson's horse. Defendant had his arm partly around Henderson when he got on his horse, and after he got on the horse he heard Henderson say to him: "Take your hand out of my pocket, you damned thief. You are trying to steal my money. I know what you are doing." Defendant replied, "I am not trying to take your money." I did not hear defendant say, "I will see you later." Think I could have heard it if it had been said. Henderson rode off, and he and some other colored boys, who had come up, started over to Sheriff Brewer's corn-shucking. That Brewer's was directly east from *Page 521 the store. That Henderson rode off on the road going directly (833) west, and the postoffice was north. That they said to defendant, "Come on; let's go on over to the shucking," and he replied, "I am not going now; I may come later." That defendant immediately left them, and went toward the postoffice, and to the corn-shucking.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. . Keath
83 N.C. 626 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1880)
State v. . Kiger
20 S.E. 456 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1894)
State v. . Hart
20 S.E. 1014 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1895)
State v. Wilson
28 S.E. 416 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1897)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
25 S.E. 858, 119 N.C. 828, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-leach-nc-1896.