State v. Le Sure Lumber Co.

115 N.W. 167, 106 Minn. 534, 1908 Minn. LEXIS 771
Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided October 16, 1908·No. Nos. 15,425—(26)·Published

Opinion

On February 7, 1908, the following opinion was filed:

PER CURIAM.

The decision in State v. Rat Portage Lumber Co., supra, page 1, 115 N. W. 162, determines this appeal. It is immaterial that here the timber permit had been extended by the board of timber commissioners. The timber cut had not been removed within the time therein specified.

[535] A reargument having been granted, on October 16, 1908, the following opinion was filed:

PER CURIAM.

In this ease the same federal questions that were urged upon the attention of the court in State v. Rat Portage Lumber Co., supra, page 13, 117 N. W. 922, were argued. As in the Rat Portage case, we have concluded to adhere to the original decision.

Denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Le Sure Lumber Co., 115 N.W. 167, 106 Minn. 534, 1908 Minn. LEXIS 771 (Mich. 1908).

115 N.W. 167 (State v. Le Sure Lumber Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Rat Portage Lumber Co.
115 N.W. 162 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1908)