State v. Layman

Oregon Supreme Court

State v. Layman

DecidedAugust 6, 1998

DocketS44245

StatusPublished

This text of State v. Layman (State v. Layman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Layman, (Or. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

Filed: August 6, 1998

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON

STATE OF OREGON,

Petitioner on Review,

v.

ADRIAN KENNETH LAYMAN,

Respondent on Review.

(CC 10-94-07580; CA A87593; SC S44245)

On petition for review filed May 21, 1997; resubmitted August 4, 1998.*

Jonathan H. Fussner, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, filed the petition for petitioner on review. With him on the petition were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General.

No appearance contra.

Before Carson, Chief Justice, and Gillette, Van Hoomissen, Durham, and Leeson, Justices.**

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The petition for review is allowed. The decision of the Court of Appeals is vacated, and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further proceedings in light of State v. Boone, 327 Or 307, ___ P2d ___ (1998).

*Appeal from Lane County Circuit Court,

Edwin E. Allen, Judge.

147 Or App 225, 935 P2d 1216 (1997).

**Fadeley, J., retired January 31, 1998, and did not participate in this decision; Graber, J., resigned March 31, 1998, and did participate in this decision; Kulongoski, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI