State v. Lawyer
This text of 890 S.W.2d 419 (State v. Lawyer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Movant appeals convictions on two counts assault first degree and two counts armed criminal action. He also appeals denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We hold the claims of trial court error are without merit and the findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment. Judg[420]*420ment affirmed in accordance with Rules 30.25(b) and Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
890 S.W.2d 419, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 13, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-lawyer-moctapp-1995.