State v. Lawrence

627 S.E.2d 615, 360 N.C. 393, 2006 N.C. LEXIS 25
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided April 7, 2006·No. 457PA04·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons stated in State v. Markeith R. Lawrence, -N.C. — , - S.E.2d — (2006), we reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals as to defendant’s seven convictions for second-degree sexual offense. However, the portion of the Court of Appeals opinion finding no error in nine of defendant’s convictions as specified in that opinion remains undisturbed. Pursuant to Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 159 L. Ed. 2d 403 (2004) and State v. Allen, 359 N.C. 425, 615 *394 S.E.2d 256 (2005), defendant’s case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further remand to the trial court for resentencing consistent with Blakely and Allen.

REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED.

Justice TIMMONS-GOODSON did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Lawrence, 627 S.E.2d 615, 360 N.C. 393, 2006 N.C. LEXIS 25 (N.C. 2006).

627 S.E.2d 615 (State v. Lawrence) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Lawrence
667 S.E.2d 262 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2008)
State v. Mueller
647 S.E.2d 440 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2007)
State v. Massey
646 S.E.2d 362 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2007)
State v. Burgess
639 S.E.2d 68 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2007)
State v. Wallace
635 S.E.2d 455 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2006)
State v. Bullock
631 S.E.2d 868 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2006)
State v. Brigman
629 S.E.2d 307 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2006)