State v. Lawrence
This text of 555 A.2d 484 (State v. Lawrence) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.
Leland Lawrence appeals his conviction by jury of two counts of trafficking in cocaine in violation of 17-A M.R.S.A. §§ 1103(1) & (2) (Class B) (1983) and one count of conspiracy to traffick in cocaine in violation of 17-A M.R.S.A. §§ 151(1) & (4), 1103(1) & (2)(A) (Class C) (1983). We affirm the judgment of the Superior Court (Cumberland County; Perkins, /.).
We find that the State adduced sufficient evidence at trial to enable a jury to rationally conclude beyond a reasonable doubt that Lawrence was guilty of the crimes charged. State v. Barry, 495 A.2d 825, 826 (Me.1985). We have consistently stated that it is the province of the jury to assess the credibility of a witness and consider the weight and significance of any other evidence. State v. Tait, 483 A.2d 745, 746 (1984); State v. Anderson, 434 A.2d 6, 8 (1981).
The entry is:
Judgment affirmed.
All concurring.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
555 A.2d 484, 1989 Me. LEXIS 60, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-lawrence-me-1989.