State v. Lawrence

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

State v. Lawrence

135 Me. 511

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine·Decided January 21, 1938·Published

Opinion

On exception to a ruling by a Justice of the Superior Court denying the respondent’s motion for a mistrial. The prosecution originated by complaint and warrant before a trial Justice. The record failing to [512]*512show the rendition of any judgment by the trial Justice and the taking and perfection of any appeal to the Superior Court, its jurisdiction is not made to appear. State v. Bechard, 135 Me., 510, 195 A., 202; 4 C. J. S., Sec. 692, page 1171. For that reason, the entry must be, Exception dismissed.

Clayton E. Eames, County Attorney, for State. William H. Niehoff, Daniel Steward, for respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On exception to a ruling by a Justice of the Superior Court denying the respondent’s motion for a mistrial. The prosecution originated by complaint and warrant before a trial Justice. The record failing to [512]*512show the rendition of any judgment by the trial Justice and the taking and perfection of any appeal to the Superior Court, its jurisdiction is not made to appear. State v. Bechard, 135 Me., 510, 195 A., 202; 4 C. J. S., Sec. 692, page 1171. For that reason, the entry must be, Exception dismissed.

Clayton E. Eames, County Attorney, for State. William H. Niehoff, Daniel Steward, for respondent.

State v. Lawrence, 135 Me. 511 (Me. 1938).

Pincite

135 Me. 511 (State v. Lawrence) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related