State v. Lawrence

Connecticut Appellate Court

State v. Lawrence

541 A.2d 550, 14 Conn. App. 816

CourtConnecticut Appellate Court

DecidedMay 18, 1988

Docket6427

StatusPublished

This text of 541 A.2d 550 (State v. Lawrence) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Appellate Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Lawrence, 541 A.2d 550, 14 Conn. App. 816 (Colo. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This appeal implicates the fact finding function of the trial court and challenges the law making powers of the legislature.

Our review of the record and transcript discloses that there was sufficient evidence introduced by the state to support a conviction of the defendant for a violation of General Statutes § 14-219 (c) (Speeding).

Further, the defendant’s claim that he was entitled to a jury trial for said violation is without merit. See General Statutes § 54-82b (a); State v. Weisser, 9 Conn. App. 255, 258, 518 A.2d 655 (1986), cert. denied, 202 Conn. 803, 519 A.2d 1207 (1987); State v. Sheldon, 5 Conn. App. 434, 499 A.2d 432 (1985).

There is no error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI