Home/Supreme Court of Connecticut/State v. Lawrence

State v. Lawrence

891 A.2d 4, 277 Conn. 901
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedJanuary 11, 2006
Docket17598
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 891 A.2d 4 (State v. Lawrence) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Lawrence, 891 A.2d 4, 277 Conn. 901 (Colo. 2006).

Opinion

891 A.2d 4 (2006)
277 Conn. 901

STATE of Connecticut
v.
Tarrance LAWRENCE.

No. 17598.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decided January 11, 2006.

Donald D. Dakers, special public defender, in support of the petition.

Michele C. Lukban, senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.

The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 91 Conn.App. 765, 882 A.2d 689 (2005), is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to consider the defendant's motion to correct an illegal sentence?"

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 17598.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Lawrence
913 A.2d 428 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
891 A.2d 4, 277 Conn. 901, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-lawrence-conn-2006.