State v. Lawlis

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. Lawlis

129 P.3d 790, 204 Or. App. 427, 2006 Ore. App. LEXIS 186

Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided February 15, 2006·No. 0507-66797; A129315·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing her to the custody of the Mental Health Division based on a finding that she suffers from a mental disorder that renders her unable to provide for her basic personal needs. She argues that, among other things, the trial court committed reversible error in failing to provide her with the advice of rights required by ORS 426.100(1). The state concedes the error and that the error is not harmless and requires reversal. We agree and accept the state’s concession.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing her to the custody of the Mental Health Division based on a finding that she suffers from a mental disorder that renders her unable to provide for her basic personal needs. She argues that, among other things, the trial court committed reversible error in failing to provide her with the advice of rights required by ORS 426.100(1). The state concedes the error and that the error is not harmless and requires reversal. We agree and accept the state’s concession.

Reversed.

State v. Lawlis, 129 P.3d 790, 204 Or. App. 427, 2006 Ore. App. LEXIS 186 (Or. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

129 P.3d 790 (State v. Lawlis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related