State v. Lawlis

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. Lawlis

129 P.3d 790, 204 Or. App. 427, 2006 Ore. App. LEXIS 186

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedFebruary 15, 2006

Docket0507-66797; A129315

StatusPublished

This text of 129 P.3d 790 (State v. Lawlis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Lawlis, 129 P.3d 790, 204 Or. App. 427, 2006 Ore. App. LEXIS 186 (Or. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing her to the custody of the Mental Health Division based on a finding that she suffers from a mental disorder that renders her unable to provide for her basic personal needs. She argues that, among other things, the trial court committed reversible error in failing to provide her with the advice of rights required by ORS 426.100(1). The state concedes the error and that the error is not harmless and requires reversal. We agree and accept the state’s concession.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing her to the custody of the Mental Health Division based on a finding that she suffers from a mental disorder that renders her unable to provide for her basic personal needs. She argues that, among other things, the trial court committed reversible error in failing to provide her with the advice of rights required by ORS 426.100(1). The state concedes the error and that the error is not harmless and requires reversal. We agree and accept the state’s concession.

Reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

129 P.3d 790, 204 Or. App. 427, 2006 Ore. App. LEXIS 186, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-lawlis-orctapp-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack