State v. Lawler

531 So. 2d 752, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2316, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4472, 1988 WL 103935
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 12, 1988·No. No. 88-0602·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this criminal prosecution the trial court made a downward departure from the recommended sentencing guideline range without assigning written legal rea[753] sons therefor. This was error. Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll). State v. Nichols, (Fla. 4th DCA 1988); State v. Matthews, 522 So.2d 1026 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988); State v. Johnson, 512 So.2d 1116 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987).

We reverse and remand with instructions to either sentence within the recommended guidelines range, or, to provide written reasons for any departure therefrom.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

ANSTEAD, LETTS and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Lawler, 531 So. 2d 752, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2316, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4472, 1988 WL 103935 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

531 So. 2d 752 (State v. Lawler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pope v. State
542 So. 2d 423 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)