State v. Lavine
117 A. 927, 97 N.J.L. 583, 1922 N.J. LEXIS 248
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Parker in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Swayze, Tbenchard, Bergen, Minturn, Black, Katzenbach, White, Heppenheimbr, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, Van Buskirk, JJ. 13.
For reversal — Hone.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Lavine, 117 A. 927, 97 N.J.L. 583, 1922 N.J. LEXIS 248 (N.J. 1922).
117 A. 927 (State v. Lavine) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Pearce v. NJ Highway Authority
300 A.2d 358 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1973)