State v. Lavene
This text of 325 So. 2d 780 (State v. Lavene) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In re: William Lavene applying for Writs of Certiorari, Prohibition, Mandamus and for Stay Order.
Writ refused. This Court will not ordinarily exercise its supervisory jurisdiction where a right of appeal exists. After sentence upon this felony conviction, defendant may appeal, and among other possible assignments of error, present the argument made in this application that the trial judge erred as a matter of law (under Art. 858, C.Cr.Pr.) when he refused to grant applicant a new trial notwithstanding the alleged newly discovered evidence.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
325 So. 2d 780, 1976 La. LEXIS 4000, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-lavene-la-1976.