State v. Laughlin

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. Laughlin

129 P.3d 790, 204 Or. App. 423, 2006 Ore. App. LEXIS 188

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedFebruary 15, 2006

Docket0506-66627; A129245

StatusPublished

This text of 129 P.3d 790 (State v. Laughlin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Laughlin, 129 P.3d 790, 204 Or. App. 423, 2006 Ore. App. LEXIS 188 (Or. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing her as a mentally ill person for a period not to exceed 180 days. Appellant argues that the record does not establish by clear and convincing evidence that she is presently a danger to herself or unable to take care of her own basic needs because of her mental disorder. The state concedes that the evidence is insufficient for involuntary commitment and that the judgment should be reversed. Upon de novo review of the record, we accept the state’s concession and reverse.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing her as a mentally ill person for a period not to exceed 180 days. Appellant argues that the record does not establish by clear and convincing evidence that she is presently a danger to herself or unable to take care of her own basic needs because of her mental disorder. The state concedes that the evidence is insufficient for involuntary commitment and that the judgment should be reversed. Upon de novo review of the record, we accept the state’s concession and reverse.

Reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

129 P.3d 790, 204 Or. App. 423, 2006 Ore. App. LEXIS 188, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-laughlin-orctapp-2006.