State v. LAUCKS

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. LAUCKS

359 S.W.3d 566, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 256, 2012 WL 612476

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 28, 2012

DocketWD 73574

StatusPublished

This text of 359 S.W.3d 566 (State v. LAUCKS) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. LAUCKS, 359 S.W.3d 566, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 256, 2012 WL 612476 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Greg Laucks appeals his conviction for the class B misdemeanor sexual misconduct in the second degree and sentence of two days in the county jail and $300 fine. He claims that the evidence was insufficient to establish beyond a reasonable doubt that he knew that his conduct was likely to cause affront or alarm. Because a published opinion would have no prece-dential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment of conviction is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Greg Laucks appeals his conviction for the class B misdemeanor sexual misconduct in the second degree and sentence of two days in the county jail and $300 fine. He claims that the evidence was insufficient to establish beyond a reasonable doubt that he knew that his conduct was likely to cause affront or alarm. Because a published opinion would have no prece-dential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment of conviction is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

359 S.W.3d 566, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 256, 2012 WL 612476, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-laucks-moctapp-2012.