State v. LAUCKS

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. LAUCKS

359 S.W.3d 566, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 256, 2012 WL 612476

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 28, 2012·No. WD 73574·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Greg Laucks appeals his conviction for the class B misdemeanor sexual misconduct in the second degree and sentence of two days in the county jail and $300 fine. He claims that the evidence was insufficient to establish beyond a reasonable doubt that he knew that his conduct was likely to cause affront or alarm. Because a published opinion would have no prece-dential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment of conviction is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Greg Laucks appeals his conviction for the class B misdemeanor sexual misconduct in the second degree and sentence of two days in the county jail and $300 fine. He claims that the evidence was insufficient to establish beyond a reasonable doubt that he knew that his conduct was likely to cause affront or alarm. Because a published opinion would have no prece-dential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment of conviction is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

State v. LAUCKS, 359 S.W.3d 566, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 256, 2012 WL 612476 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

359 S.W.3d 566 (State v. LAUCKS) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.