State v. Latter

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. Latter

732 P.2d 960, 84 Or. App. 136, 1987 Ore. App. LEXIS 3007

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedFebruary 25, 1987

Docket86-7008; CA A39837

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 732 P.2d 960 (State v. Latter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Latter, 732 P.2d 960, 84 Or. App. 136, 1987 Ore. App. LEXIS 3007 (Or. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals his conviction for driving under the influence of intoxicants and assigns as error the trial court’s admission of testimony regarding the results of a horizontal gaze nystagmus test. Because this case is not materially distinguishable from State v. Reed, 83 Or App 451, 732 P2d 66 (1987), we conclude that the trial court erred in admitting the testimony.

Reversed and remanded for a new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals his conviction for driving under the influence of intoxicants and assigns as error the trial court’s admission of testimony regarding the results of a horizontal gaze nystagmus test. Because this case is not materially distinguishable from State v. Reed, 83 Or App 451, 732 P2d 66 (1987), we conclude that the trial court erred in admitting the testimony.

Reversed and remanded for a new trial.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

732 P.2d 960, 84 Or. App. 136, 1987 Ore. App. LEXIS 3007, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-latter-orctapp-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack