State v. Latter
732 P.2d 960, 84 Or. App. 136, 1987 Ore. App. LEXIS 3007
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided February 25, 1987·No. 86-7008; CA A39837·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Defendant appeals his conviction for driving under the influence of intoxicants and assigns as error the trial court’s admission of testimony regarding the results of a horizontal gaze nystagmus test. Because this case is not materially distinguishable from State v. Reed, 83 Or App 451, 732 P2d 66 (1987), we conclude that the trial court erred in admitting the testimony.
Reversed and remanded for a new trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Latter, 732 P.2d 960, 84 Or. App. 136, 1987 Ore. App. LEXIS 3007 (Or. Ct. App. 1987).
732 P.2d 960 (State v. Latter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lange v. Minton
738 P.2d 576 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1987)