State v. Latchison

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Latchison

504 S.W.3d 738, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 800, 2016 WL 4437974

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 23, 2016·No. ED 103521·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Devonta Latehison appeals from his conviction of both robbery in the first degree and armed criminal action. We affirm.-

The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence, and the trial court did not clearly err. An extended opinion would have ho precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Devonta Latehison appeals from his conviction of both robbery in the first degree and armed criminal action. We affirm.-

The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence, and the trial court did not clearly err. An extended opinion would have ho precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Latchison, 504 S.W.3d 738, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 800, 2016 WL 4437974 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

504 S.W.3d 738 (State v. Latchison) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.