State v. LaSpina
383 P.2d 775, 235 Or. 75, 1963 Ore. LEXIS 474
This text of 383 P.2d 775 (State v. LaSpina) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. LaSpina, 383 P.2d 775, 235 Or. 75, 1963 Ore. LEXIS 474 (Or. 1963).
Opinion
The defendant was convicted of the crime of armed robbery and appeals. He assigns as error (1) lack of proper identification of two guns admitted in evidence, and (2) that the sentence of 15 years constitutes cruel and inhuman punishment.
We have carefully reviewed the record. The assignments of error are without merit.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
383 P.2d 775, 235 Or. 75, 1963 Ore. LEXIS 474, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-laspina-or-1963.