State v. Lashly

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Lashly

886 S.W.2d 939, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1588, 1994 WL 554612

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 11, 1994·No. No. 65497·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his conviction in a bench trial of the Class A misdemeanor, Driving While Suspended, Revoked or Canceled, § 302.321 RSMo 1986. He was sentenced by the judge to sixty days in jail. We affirm.

We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error are without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his conviction in a bench trial of the Class A misdemeanor, Driving While Suspended, Revoked or Canceled, § 302.321 RSMo 1986. He was sentenced by the judge to sixty days in jail. We affirm.

We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error are without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Lashly, 886 S.W.2d 939, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1588, 1994 WL 554612 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

886 S.W.2d 939 (State v. Lashly) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.