State v. Lasala

625 So. 2d 1214, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 3167, 1993 WL 64592
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 10, 1993·No. No. 92-0330·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Having accepted jurisdiction pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.160, this court reverses the suppression order that was presented in this appeal for review, and remands the case to the trial court. See State v. Rochelle, 609 So.2d 613 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992).

GLICKSTEIN, C.J., and ANSTEAD and HERSEY, JJ., concur.

ON MOTION FOR CERTIFICATION

We grant the motion and certify as questions of great public importance those certified in State v. Nevadomski 619 So.2d 310 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993).

GLICKSTEIN, C.J., and ANSTEAD, J., concur.

HERSEY, J., dissents without opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Lasala, 625 So. 2d 1214, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 3167, 1993 WL 64592 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

625 So. 2d 1214 (State v. Lasala) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Nevadomski
619 So. 2d 310 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
State v. Rochelle
609 So. 2d 613 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)