State v. Larumbo

Supreme Court of South Carolina

State v. Larumbo

16 S.C.L. 183

DecidedJanuary 15, 1824

StatusPublished

This text of 16 S.C.L. 183 (State v. Larumbo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Larumbo, 16 S.C.L. 183 (S.C. 1824).

Pincite

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered< by

Mr Jwttc&i Gantt.

There is certainly an. apparent inconsistency in-the discrimination which the .jury have made as to. the guilt of .these, Seyeral,defendants, ..who .were implicated in.the.same indictment,?. [184]*184the offence charged against each was the same, and the evidence-equally affected both. The. court, therefore, in the exercise of that discretion with which they are invested, are of opinion, that a new trial should be granted.

Wright, for motion. Attorney General, contra.; JVott, .Johnson and Bay, Justices, concurred.— Colcoe7'/ Justice, I dissent,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The opinion of the Court was delivered< by

Mr Jwttc&i Gantt.

There is certainly an. apparent inconsistency in-the discrimination which the .jury have made as to. the guilt of .these, Seyeral,defendants, ..who .were implicated in.the.same indictment,?. [184]*184the offence charged against each was the same, and the evidence-equally affected both. The. court, therefore, in the exercise of that discretion with which they are invested, are of opinion, that a new trial should be granted.

Wright, for motion. Attorney General, contra.; JVott, .Johnson and Bay, Justices, concurred.— Colcoe7'/ Justice, I dissent,

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

16 S.C.L. 183, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-larumbo-sc-1824.