State v. LaRose

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

State v. LaRose

108 A. 925, 118 Me. 502, 1920 Me. LEXIS 10

DecidedFebruary 14, 1920

StatusPublished

This text of 108 A. 925 (State v. LaRose) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. LaRose, 108 A. 925, 118 Me. 502, 1920 Me. LEXIS 10 (Me. 1920).

Pincite

Opinion

This is an indictment for liquor nuisance. The defense offered no evidence. At'the close of the testimony introduced by the State, counsel for respondent moved for a directed verdict in his favor on the ground of insufficient evidence. To the refusal of the court to grant this motion exceptions were taken. The exceptions are without merit. No other verdict than guilty would have been justified by the evidence. Exceptions overruled. Judgment for the State.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This is an indictment for liquor nuisance. The defense offered no evidence. At'the close of the testimony introduced by the State, counsel for respondent moved for a directed verdict in his favor on the ground of insufficient evidence. To the refusal of the court to grant this motion exceptions were taken. The exceptions are without merit. No other verdict than guilty would have been justified by the evidence. Exceptions overruled. Judgment for the State.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

108 A. 925, 118 Me. 502, 1920 Me. LEXIS 10, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-larose-me-1920.