State v. Lark

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Lark

79 So. 334, 143 La. 771, 1918 La. LEXIS 1535

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedJune 29, 1918

DocketNo. 23097

StatusPublished

This text of 79 So. 334 (State v. Lark) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Lark, 79 So. 334, 143 La. 771, 1918 La. LEXIS 1535 (La. 1918).

Pincite

Opinion

MONROE, C. J.

The party defendant in this case is different, but the facts disclosed, the relief prayed for, and the law applicable thereto are the same, as in the case of “State v. Ad. Block, In re Ad. Block, applying,” etc. (No. 23096) 79 South. 332,¹ this day decided. Eor the reasons assigned in the opinion therein handed down, therefore, it is ordered that the Conviction and sentence heroin appealed from be annulled, and the relator discharged.

O’NIELL, J., concurs in the decree.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MONROE, C. J.

The party defendant in this case is different, but the facts disclosed, the relief prayed for, and the law applicable thereto are the same, as in the case of “State v. Ad. Block, In re Ad. Block, applying,” etc. (No. 23096) 79 South. 332,¹ this day decided. Eor the reasons assigned in the opinion therein handed down, therefore, it is ordered that the Conviction and sentence heroin appealed from be annulled, and the relator discharged.

O’NIELL, J., concurs in the decree.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

79 So. 334, 143 La. 771, 1918 La. LEXIS 1535, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-lark-la-1918.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack