State v. Laramore

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Laramore

573 S.W.3d 763

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 30, 2019

DocketNo. ED 105892

StatusPublished

This text of 573 S.W.3d 763 (State v. Laramore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Laramore, 573 S.W.3d 763 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Dennis Laramore ("Appellant") appeals from the trial court's judgment convicting him, following a jury trial, of eight counts of unlawful possession of a firearm, in violation of Section 571.070 RSMo 2000. Appellant, a persistent offender, was sentenced to ten years for each count, counts II through VIII to run concurrently, and consecutive to count I, for a total of twenty years.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Dennis Laramore ("Appellant") appeals from the trial court's judgment convicting him, following a jury trial, of eight counts of unlawful possession of a firearm, in violation of Section 571.070 RSMo 2000. Appellant, a persistent offender, was sentenced to ten years for each count, counts II through VIII to run concurrently, and consecutive to count I, for a total of twenty years.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

573 S.W.3d 763, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-laramore-moctapp-2019.