State v. Lappin

471 So. 2d 182, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1519, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14637
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 18, 1985
DocketNo. 84-964
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 471 So. 2d 182 (State v. Lappin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Lappin, 471 So. 2d 182, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1519, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14637 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Opinion

BASKIN, Judge.

The state charged Lappin with reckless driving and aggravated assault on a police officer as a result of an incident in which Lappin attempted to strike two police officers with his motor vehicle. Following his conviction in county court on the reckless driving count, Lappin filed a motion to dismiss the aggravated assault charge on double jeopardy grounds. The court granted the motion and dismissed the assault charge. The state appeals, arguing that the charged offenses are distinct crimes with different elements and that the prosecution of both charges is proper. We agree.

The Florida Supreme Court, applying the test set forth in Blockburger v. United States, 284 U.S. 299, 52 S.Ct. 180, 76 L.Ed. 306 (1932), states that in deciding double jeopardy questions, the court must base its decision on the statutory elements of the offenses rather than the charging document or proof. State v. Baker, 456 So.2d 419 (Fla.1984); State v. Gibson, 452 So.2d 553 (Fla.1984); State v. Baker, 452 So.2d 927 (Fla.1984). If each offense has at least one element that the other lacks, the offenses constitute separate crimes even though they may arise from the same act or factual event. Baker, 456 So.2d 419; Gibson; § 775.021(4), Fla.Stat. (1983). Because reckless driving, § 316.192, Fla.Stat. (1983),1 and aggravated assault, § 784.021, Fla.Stat. (1983),2 do not have common statutory elements, they are distinct and separate crimes. Thus, even though both charges arise from the same act, double jeopardy principles present no impediment to Lappin’s prosecution for both offenses.

For these reasons, we reverse the lower court’s dismissal of the aggravated assault charge and remand for further proceedings in accordance with this opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Timothy Anderson v. State of Florida
247 So. 3d 680 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)
State v. Godwin
632 So. 2d 228 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
471 So. 2d 182, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1519, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14637, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-lappin-fladistctapp-1985.