State v. Lapole

Court of Appeals of Maryland

State v. Lapole

149 A.3d 601, 450 Md. 515, 2016 Md. LEXIS 749

Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided November 22, 2016·No. No. 54, Sept. Term, 2016·Published

Opinion

Barbera, C.J., Greene, Adkins, McDonald, Watts, Hotten, Getty, JJ.

PER CURIAM ORDER

**516The petition for writ of certiorari in the above-entitled case having been granted and a motion for reconsideration having been filed thereafter, it is this 22nd day of November, 2016,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the motion for reconsideration be, and it is hereby, granted, and it is further

ORDERED that the writ of certiorari be, and it is hereby, dismissed with costs, the petition having been improvidently granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Barbera, C.J., Greene, Adkins, McDonald, Watts, Hotten, Getty, JJ.

PER CURIAM ORDER

**516The petition for writ of certiorari in the above-entitled case having been granted and a motion for reconsideration having been filed thereafter, it is this 22nd day of November, 2016,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the motion for reconsideration be, and it is hereby, granted, and it is further

ORDERED that the writ of certiorari be, and it is hereby, dismissed with costs, the petition having been improvidently granted.

State v. Lapole, 149 A.3d 601, 450 Md. 515, 2016 Md. LEXIS 749 (Md. 2016).

Pincite

149 A.3d 601 (State v. Lapole) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.