State v. Lanoue
378 A.2d 1077, 119 R.I. 918, 1977 R.I. LEXIS 2087
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Lanoue. Read the opinion of the Court — 117 R.I. 342 →
Opinion
Because he failed to follow the avenue of direct appeal, the petitioner seeks a writ of certiorari from this court. However, before we can address the issue of the writ, certain questions of fact must be established. Because this court cannot take testimony in a proceeding of this nature, the case is remanded to the Superior Court for an evidentiary hearing. See Lonardo v. Langlois, 98 R.I. 493, 205 A.2d 19 (1964).
After a hearing and fact findings, the Superior Court shall return the record to this court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Lanoue, 378 A.2d 1077, 119 R.I. 918, 1977 R.I. LEXIS 2087 (R.I. 1977).
378 A.2d 1077 (State v. Lanoue) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lonardo v. Langlois
205 A.2d 19 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1964)