State v. Lanning
This text of 238 S.W.3d 737 (State v. Lanning) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
George Lanning appeals the judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of one count of statutory sodomy and four counts of first degree child molestation. We find that the trial court did not err in admitting State’s Exhibit 1. Lanning’s second point on appeal seeks relief based on an assertion that is clearly refuted by the record, and is without merit. With respect to the third point on appeal, we find that Lanning waived any claim of error regarding the verdict directors.
An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment under Rule 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
238 S.W.3d 737, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1553, 2007 WL 3342168, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-lanning-moctapp-2007.