State v. Lanig

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. Lanig

838 P.2d 645, 116 Or. App. 48, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 1969

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedOctober 28, 1992

Docket91010070; CA A73089

StatusPublished

This text of 838 P.2d 645 (State v. Lanig) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Lanig, 838 P.2d 645, 116 Or. App. 48, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 1969 (Or. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

The only issue in this appeal is whether the sentencing court erred with respect to the length of the term of post-prison supervision that it imposed on defendant’s conviction for second degree robbery. At trial, the parties agreed that the appropriate grid block is 6-F, for which the presumptive disposition is 36 months probation. OAR 253-05-008(l)(c). The sentencing court imposed a dispositional departure of 13 months in prison as well as a 36-month term of post-prison supervision. Defendant does not challenge the departure sentence.

OAR 253-05-002(2)(b) provides a post-prison supervision term of 2 years for a conviction with a crime seriousness ranking of 6. Although it appears from the record that the sentencing court did not intend to depart from the post-prison supervision term prescribed by the rule, it did not enter an amended judgment correcting the error. The state concedes that the sentencing court erred in imposing a 36-month term of post-prison supervision. We accept the concession.

Conviction affirmed; remanded for resentencing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

The only issue in this appeal is whether the sentencing court erred with respect to the length of the term of post-prison supervision that it imposed on defendant’s conviction for second degree robbery. At trial, the parties agreed that the appropriate grid block is 6-F, for which the presumptive disposition is 36 months probation. OAR 253-05-008(l)(c). The sentencing court imposed a dispositional departure of 13 months in prison as well as a 36-month term of post-prison supervision. Defendant does not challenge the departure sentence.

OAR 253-05-002(2)(b) provides a post-prison supervision term of 2 years for a conviction with a crime seriousness ranking of 6. Although it appears from the record that the sentencing court did not intend to depart from the post-prison supervision term prescribed by the rule, it did not enter an amended judgment correcting the error. The state concedes that the sentencing court erred in imposing a 36-month term of post-prison supervision. We accept the concession.

Conviction affirmed; remanded for resentencing.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

838 P.2d 645, 116 Or. App. 48, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 1969, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-lanig-orctapp-1992.