State v. Langley
907 So. 2d 732, 2005 La. LEXIS 2275, 2005 WL 1712279
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Langley. Read the opinion of the Court — 958 So. 2d 1160 →
Opinion
Concurring.
On the showing made and considering the fact that the applicant has not shown any forthcoming hearings that compel the advance of costs at this time, I concur in the majority’s denial of the writ and the stay and would allow the district court to oversee the execution of its plan to provide funding for this capital defendant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Langley, 907 So. 2d 732, 2005 La. LEXIS 2275, 2005 WL 1712279 (La. 2005).
907 So. 2d 732 (State v. Langley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.