State v. Lange

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. Lange

116 P.3d 929, 201 Or. App. 96, 2005 Ore. App. LEXIS 973

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedAugust 3, 2005

Docket0303-31392; A123874

StatusPublished

This text of 116 P.3d 929 (State v. Lange) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Lange, 116 P.3d 929, 201 Or. App. 96, 2005 Ore. App. LEXIS 973 (Or. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals her conviction for possession of a controlled substance, ORS 475.992, arguing that the trial court committed reversible error in trying defendant to the court without obtaining a written waiver of her right to a jury trial. The state concedes that this constitutes reversible error. We agree, see State v. McBride, 135 Or App 690, 899 P2d 1218 (1995), and therefore accept the state’s concession.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals her conviction for possession of a controlled substance, ORS 475.992, arguing that the trial court committed reversible error in trying defendant to the court without obtaining a written waiver of her right to a jury trial. The state concedes that this constitutes reversible error. We agree, see State v. McBride, 135 Or App 690, 899 P2d 1218 (1995), and therefore accept the state’s concession.

Reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

116 P.3d 929, 201 Or. App. 96, 2005 Ore. App. LEXIS 973, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-lange-orctapp-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack